Many DMs allow it, if forum posts are anything to go by. However, a quick check at least reveals no actual rules for that entry, and really there’s not really any good reasons why petals cannot be player characters. They are “LA +2 (cohort),” which is frequently taken to mean that they cannot be player characters but only cohorts (e.g. They also get Improved Initiative as a bonus feat, and large ability score bonuses. That said, LA +4 hurts, to the point that I don’t really consider the pixie playable.Īnother good fey is the petal from Monster Manual III: they’re Tiny, which makes them damnably hard to hit, and eldritch blast doesn’t care what size you are. Pixie warlocks are somewhat traditional: their permanent greater invisbility is much better than the walk unseen invocation (which is as the spell invisibility and therefore broken by offensive actions), and their racial flight saves you an invocation on fell flight. Then again, the warlock class is on the weak end so maybe your DM will allow it. Probably unreasonably so, actually many DMs will balk at it. 304 is extremely potent for its minimal level adjustment. The unseelie fey template from Dragon vol. The reasons these are appropriate should be obvious. This is stuff that involves being a fey, or having fey heritage, or interacting with fey. Some warlocks focus on eldritch blast and damage, and have little use for Charisma, but I don’t think that’s you-I imagine you’ll be taking few Eldritch Essences or Blast Shapes, and focusing a lot on invocations and other effects that increase the number of ways you can mess with your opponents. An unseelie fey warlock: intense, compelling, mysterious.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |